<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alaska and Let&#8217;s Name a Monkey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.barrioflores.net/blog/2005/02/13/alaska-and-lets-name-a-monkey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.barrioflores.net/blog/2005/02/13/alaska-and-lets-name-a-monkey/</link>
	<description>eddie avila</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josh Renaud</title>
		<link>http://www.barrioflores.net/blog/2005/02/13/alaska-and-lets-name-a-monkey/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Renaud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barrioflores.net/blog/2005/02/13/alaska-and-lets-name-a-monkey/#comment-349</guid>
		<description>That Washington Times piece was a very interesting read... But my wife thought it was a bit idealistic.

She believes the author overlooked the fact that the Indians who have been fooled by Evo and company are Andean. The gas is not in the Andes, it's in the east. The Guaranis, etc, who live around the gas support exporting it.

Even if such companies could be created, she says, the Quechuas and Aymaras couldn't be stakeholders, and therefore wouldn't benefit.

I'm a bit more optimistic, though. I think this sort of plan could liven up the debate since it might appeal to indian groups. But I have a feeling it would be a tough sell to the Comite Pro Santa Cruz and others tied to the petroleum industry.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Washington Times piece was a very interesting read&#8230; But my wife thought it was a bit idealistic.</p>
<p>She believes the author overlooked the fact that the Indians who have been fooled by Evo and company are Andean. The gas is not in the Andes, it&#8217;s in the east. The Guaranis, etc, who live around the gas support exporting it.</p>
<p>Even if such companies could be created, she says, the Quechuas and Aymaras couldn&#8217;t be stakeholders, and therefore wouldn&#8217;t benefit.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a bit more optimistic, though. I think this sort of plan could liven up the debate since it might appeal to indian groups. But I have a feeling it would be a tough sell to the Comite Pro Santa Cruz and others tied to the petroleum industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB</title>
		<link>http://www.barrioflores.net/blog/2005/02/13/alaska-and-lets-name-a-monkey/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>MB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barrioflores.net/blog/2005/02/13/alaska-and-lets-name-a-monkey/#comment-348</guid>
		<description>It is not surprising. The WT is the conservative voice in the Washington area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not surprising. The WT is the conservative voice in the Washington area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
